Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

"Drag Me To Hell" review

June 29th 2009 09:46
Bitch war
Credit risk.



Drag Me To Hell, Sam Raimi’s long-awaited return to wacky horror after 22 years that felt like 63, is an atmospheric, laidback, amusing pastiche of Thinner meets The Ring by way of The Haunting (the good ‘63 one, which it references). Although its loud, exquisitely timed grace notes are best seen with a big audience, it'll likely seem a stately, mannered Victorian poetry reading compared to the frisky, fast-paced genius of Raimi’s 1987 masterpiece Evil Dead II. But while slaving in Sony’s Spider-Man furnace for six years may have given Raimi too much of a taste for CGI effects in material that cries out for a grittier, cheaper texture, it also seems to have helped him hone his already loony comic sensibilities into something like razor-sharp elegance. Where Army of Darkness strained to gracefully make the horrific funny and vice versa, there are a lot of laughs in Drag Me To Hell, and, a bit incredibly, none are unintentional.


The script, penned by Raimi with his brother Ivan (Ted shows up offscreen for a second as a doctor who assures Justin Long that his girlfriend’s nervous breakdown is “nothing to worry about”), is clever, goofy and rich with poetic dread, usually in the same scene, and its (probably deliberate) narrative inconsistencies can even be charitably viewed as intentionally evocative nods to the primal terrors and eerie dream-illogic of a Grimm’s fairy tale. It also has that awesome title, an iconic finale, and a ton of scenes of beautiful Alison Lohman getting thrown up on and orally/nasally violated. Whereas Bruce Campbell’s Ash was lovably dickish, Lohman’s Christine Brown is a sweet, innocent loan officer. And interestingly, whereas Ash looked progressively more ragged the more punishment he took from his supernatural oppressors, the progressively hotter Lohman’s torments make her.


We learn a lot more about Christine in one movie than we know about Ash after three. We discover she grew up on a farm and used to be fat. She has a kitten and a boyfriend named Clay Dalton, who teaches Skepticism in the Supernatural or something at the local university, a position that apparently pays better than you’d think. Christine desperately wants a minor promotion at her bank, mainly to impress Clay’s mom and her future mother-in-law, whom she learns disapproves of her because she grew up on said farm, even if she now works in finance and makes delicious baked goods and is beautiful, intelligent, tasteful, and affectionate. (If that sounds like a plotline from any silent movie from the ‘20s, it’s because movies made back then were shot at 16 fps, and Sam Raimi likes undercranking.)

Unfortunately for Christine, her promotion to the desk by the brighter window is also being sought by an unctuous rival named Stu Rubin even though he’s Asian. Christine may be competent, industrious, and stunning, but since Rubin is less experienced and repeatedly a patronizing dick to her in front of the boss, he’s in the front running, and the boss gravely advises Christine to be crueler to their debtors (i.e., ”make the tough decisions”) if she really wants that promotion. To her eternal misfortune, she interprets this as a mandate to apologetically foreclose on Sylvia Ganush, a wretched, shabby gypsy crone (played with hilarious zeal by Lorna Raver), who has a glass eye, leprous nails, a bad cough, and dentures the color of pickled caveman semen. Ganush breaks down in the middle of the office and begs her shrieking and wailing for an extension, finally clawing at Christine in an apoplexy of rage and degraded humiliation. Christine calls for security, which in gypsy-speak is a grave insult. This traumatizing encounter is soon followed by an ingenious tour de force showdown in a parking garage involving a handkerchief, spittle, stapled eyelids, and seat-belts – a sequence so beautifully staged, acted, and timed that it totally eclipses everything else that happens for the next hour.

Although Christine technically emerges the winner of the contest, she unwisely forgets to drive away afterward, instead letting this dangerous scuttling creature grab a button from her coat, curse it with her breath, and return it to her accepting fist without putting up any resistance at all. Ganush then vanishes, and the cops eventually show up but apparently don’t impound Ganush’s car*, as we’ll see it again later in her driveway. The moral: when you staple old women, always aim for the lips.

Night falls. Christine can’t escape the persistent sense that she’s being stalked by demons, although their intentions at least initially seem restricted to trying to irritate her with deafening foley work. A psychic named Rham Jas, whose place of business happens to be three feet away from where she’s standing at the moment and always open, grimly informs her that she’s been cursed by the gypsy and, after a little more cash and prodding, furthermore that she has only three days left till some demons drag her to hell, during which time she’ll be relentlessly and arbitrarily tormented and victimized by an invisible lamia and his pet fly. (You’d think with such rock-solid connections to the underworld, gypsies wouldn’t have to sweat mortgage payments so much, but my theory is that Satan’s the CEO of Christine’s bank. And all banks.) Rham Jas suggests she try killing her cat, advice Christine reluctantly complies with, after being tossed around, spelunked, eyeballed by a piece of cake in the best dinner-with-in-laws scene since Eraserhead, and majestically thrown up on some more.

Instead of soliciting a second opinion (or, better yet, hiring another gypsy to remove the curse), she keeps going back to Jas, who finally admits that the lamia seems unimpressed by her feline offering and says their only recourse is to have a séance, which will cost exactly 10 grand up front.

Raising the 10 grand proves insuperable to Christine, even though she has a house, presumably sterling credit, and a job in finance, but luckily her teacher boyfriend picks up the tab. The séance is mostly a failure, like everything else Jas has proposed. Rather than insisting on a refund, Christine gets yet more advice from him: she can give away the cursed button to someone else, who will inherit the lamia (advice that might’ve been handy two days and one innocent cat earlier). Finding a suitable candidate proves more ethically difficult for Christine than she anticipated. And things finally conclude with a fairly telegraphed twist that I enjoyed but sort of wish had been the penultimate setup to something genuinely unexpected. And longer.

Drag Me To Hell is endearing and enjoyable and watchable. If it has an issue (outside of the needless PG-13 constraints; Raimi seems to be making a point to the MPAA but I rather wish he’d made it instead with an X-rated Spider-Man), it might be that the lamia is a great antagonist conceptually and historically but too spectral, invisible and impossible for Christine to interact with much to be satisfying visually, and that Ganush, her more tangible foe, can only puke on her whether dead or alive, and is put out of commission pretty early. (A perplexing number of people I saw the movie with afterwards interpreted Christine’s demonic issues to be imaginary a la the last few minutes of Taxi Driver. My response is that her prospective mother-in-law certainly seemed to see that fly.)

Finally, it’s also hard for the greedy 12-year-old in me not to feel a little cheated that we never get an actual glimpse of Hell, or the creatures whose gnarled talons drag one down to it (or why they drag so slowly). There are very, very few visions I’d like to see more than Raimi’s Inferno, past and future Spider-Man sequels notwithstanding.

*”The Classic,” obviously. (And if you don’t know what “The Classic” is, you need to stay in more.)
23
Vote
   


"Star Trek" review

May 30th 2009 06:19
Live long and pros-fur.
TJ Hooker cradles his beloved quatloo.


I confess that I’ve never been much of a Trekkie. You read enough Iain Banks or Olaf Stapledon or even Vernor Vinge, and by comparison Trek’s constant space-time anomalies (how come they never use the same one twice?), excruciating puns, and simplistic, spelled-out morality seem even more vanilla than it all struck me at 12. (Go read Lord of Light or Star Maker and then explain to me how every Star Trek episode combined is in any way, shape, or form better value.) I remember irritably wondering why, if the Vulcans were the smart ones, weren’t we joining their Federation? And how could we cross-breed with them if they had green blood and, uh, no emotions like, say, erotic ardor? Shouldn’t they have more complex emotions?

Then as now, I found it odd that for a show so enshrined by my many, many academically superior peers, this poster-child for NASA recruitment and interracial kisses, the self-proclaimed inspirer of moon-launches and Voyager (the actual Voyager, not the Star Trek spin-off and not “V’jur”) sure was heavy on goofy “science” -- even to me, a kid who considered Lidsville believable. My gut instinct was that people gravitated to Star Trek because it was, for a couple decades, the only game in TV-sci-fi town, or at least it was till Space: 1999, which was awesome till they ruined it with that animal chick who could only turn into Earth-animals (even though she was an alien who’d never been to Earth before). Why was it the only game in town? As we now know, network execs tend to be 30 years or so behind the curve.

Yet over time, ‘60’s Star Trek grew on me. Tribbles, Tholian webs, aging-rays, Spock performing brain surgery on himself unanesthetized, and aging Greek gods making seasoned military veterans bray like donkeys (or Star Trek nerds) were acquired tastes – but admittedly piquant, especially when set against the increasingly austere series reboots (no offense, Patrick Stewart). I gradually came to appreciate the psychedelic bright palette, Kirk’s dickish smirk, Spock’s dubious eyebrow, Uhura’s thighs, and McCoy’s tantrums. Granted, there was rarely much suspense or sense of wonder about the universe, but the characters and sets had a vitality absent from a lot of TV fare, and the budgetary cheapness actually added something cool that none of the pricier subsequent incarnations even bothered to see as a virtue: a sense of isolation, the quiet sense that the Enterprise really was out on the edge of unexplored forever, far from help, all on their own. Cheapness forces creativity. That’s why most people and things suck progressively more the more successful they get. Money is what makes sharks jump, ever higher.

And to his vast credit, director and too-busy-to-care-about-Lost-anymore guy J.J. Abrams doesn’t let his humongous budget get in the way. The movie’s issues are more based on its being essentially a rush-job, but Abrams has a tenacious flair for rush-jobs. He’s understandably ratcheted up the mindless “action” (i.e., CGI) and contrived some hastily established tensions between Kirk and Spock to camouflage the absence of a compelling villain (no offense, Eric Bana), but Abrams and his writers deserve full props not only for incorporating a lot of the campy wacktacularity that was so endemic, however unintentional, to the source material but for embracing it (well, for the first hour or so anyway). Star Trek ’09 is a feathery slapdash fondue of go-go boots, pastel lasers, arbitrary swordfights, a scene with a pair of swollen hands that feels like John Landis came in and directed for a day, and black holes created by “red matter” that either destroy planets or send you back through time, depending on whatever words Nimoy’s saying. It’s dumb but it’s dumb fun. Mostly.

A lot of credit goes to the new cast. Chris Pine doesn’t have Shatner’s swinging-dick braggadocio, and his pretty-boy Dawson’s Creek-esque dreaminess is initially off-putting, as is the fact that, a bit weirdly, the movie never really gives him a chance to display his tactical acumen or leadership. Early on we learn he’s a skilled hacker; he effortlessly cracks Spock’s Kobayashi Maru code, but inexplicably he’s too dumb to cover his tracks or even go through the motions. Later, he basically inherits the captain’s chair of the Enterprise by emotionally manipulating a more intelligent, competent crewman (young Spock, again effortlessly ensorcelled by this apparent dumbass), and only then because a wise mentor (old Spock) told him exactly how to do so. (Just out of curiosity, why is his captaincy permanent?) I kind of liked how Shatner’s Kirk figured shit out on his own. Bruce Greenwood’s Commander Pike dotes on this new Kirk and tells us that he aced some aptitude tests, but we never actually see Kirk evince much starfaring aptitude; I found it hard to believe this character even showed up on test day. When we first meet him as a “wild” kid, it’s to watch him purposely drive a stolen hot rod over a cliff – this guy’s “natural” starship captain material? In what universe? (Oh, wait…) Like Spock, he’s basically defined by his angst (his dad heroically dies distracting a Romulan supervessel by letting it blow up his ship). Right up until the end, this clueless Kirk gets his ass handed to him every time, or gets lucky. But none of that’s Pine’s fault, and all that said, with immense shoes to fill, and even written as a buffoon, he holds his own here, conveying a curiously sympathetic arrogance, a sense of coiled energy, tenacity, and ego that you can see conceivably evolving into a parallel Shatner. Even if we never see him really tested in this movie. Which would have been better.

Zachary Quinto’s Spock obviously lacks the advantage of Leonard Nimoy’s iconic skeptical purr (a contrast that’s only underscored by a scene he has to play alongside the actual Nimoy). He’s been “modernized” as a sexualized, glowering tragic figure that’s pretty much the (bi-)polar opposite of Nimoy’s serene mystic. But his detestation of Kirk is pretty watchable, made clever and ironic by our recollections of the original characters’ rapport and, of course, by all we’ve read over the years about Shatner’s frosty relations with his former cast-mates. Whether by ballsy design or corporate neutering, the new Spock works, even if the stoicism we associate with him is junked at every turn: Uhura basically pussywhips him into letting her join the Enterprise crew, he lets Kirk infuriate him into calmly relinquishing command, and the story’s carefully timed tragedies shoehorn him into being perpetually grief-stricken and pissed off. But like Pine, you can see Quinto growing into the part with each line. And he has a great seething glare after Kirk gives him a booming fratboy clap on the shoulder.

The rest of the crewmates do capable work but aren’t onscreen long enough to make much more than a cursory impression. John Cho (Harold of Kumar fame) plays Sulu, a guy whose job is to compute nav points but who packs a sword just in case. Zoe Saldana’s Uhura is sexy and competent, in the manner of all modern blockbuster heroines; she has an ongoing “romance” with Spock, which means she leaves her post and kisses him for minutes on end whenever he leaves the bridge. Anton Yelchin’s Chekov gets to talk funny for a minute. Simon Pegg’s Scotty shows up near the end for a half-assed homage to Augustus Gloop, along with a diminutive alien sidekick who doesn’t do anything.

But the real scene-stealer is Karl Urban as Dr. McCoy, who scores incredulous laughs every time he opens his mouth. Casting Eomer as Dr. McCoy sounded like a casting decision made on acid, but Urban seamlessly Robert-Downeys into the role and wields a syringe with such zeal that a growing part of me genuinely wishes the whole movie had been about him.

Things I hate…The absurdly constant pileups of geographical happenstance: Kirk lives in Iowa, as does McCoy, right near a big canyon where they’re building the Enterprise, presumably because Iowa has lots of starship-sized canyons. Leonard Nimoy’s elderly Spock just happens to be hanging out in an ice-cave where Kirk just happens to be exiled by an angry young Captain Spock (why not just confine him to the ship’s brig?), with Scotty just happening to occupy a nearby parking garage with his sidekick and a Tribble. Bana by chance kills Kirk’s father, then waits 25 years and effortlessly happens on old Spock just so he can…do what again? And why would he let Spock, the presumed destroyer of his world, go instead of killing him? And why didn’t the Romulan strangling Kirk towards the end just let him fall? And what’s with all the deep chasms and spiky Magic Rock protuberances on the bridge of Bana’s mining-ship? And where’d he get all the firepower? And why would the Beastie Boys still be popular 300 years from now? And why’s the last battle so easy -- Spock just shoots a fragile metal column without any resistance? In this canon, the Vulcans are snotty and ill-defended and ostensibly deserve their demise. And I know this is a reboot and all, but why is every character so different in this timeline if the defining event, the destruction of Romulus, hasn’t actually happened yet? Why even have retcon and alternate timelines at all instead of simply establishing this as a new beginning, a la Batman? Oh yeah, Nimoy.

At the end, there’s a medal ceremony like the one from Star Wars, although unlike the alien bar scene, ice planet sequence, Ugnaught, world-destroying weapon, and father-son stuff also lifted from Star Wars, in this medal ceremony the crucial contributions of others like Sulu, Scotty, and Spock go ignored and only Kirk is rewarded. Which in a manifest destiny way also reminded me of the original series*. And which I suppose for an American summer blockbuster based on an old TV series is only logical.

*In Trek ’09 the planet Vulcan is destroyed, while the white man’s Earth is spared; wouldn’t it have put an interesting, genuinely egalitarian spin on things if those had been reversed.
33
Vote
   


"Crank: High Voltage" review

April 23rd 2009 09:06
Chev Chelios Chev Chelios chim chim cheree
It's not his brain they're after.




The first half of the middle chapter of what will undoubtedly become the Crank tetralogy (Chev Chelios' story now feels exactly half complete) is frisky and charmingly retarded, if not quite as inspired as its predecessor (think Escape From L.A. or Army of Darkness). This time writer-directors Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor don’t have the WTF element of surprise on their side, although it’s hard to chastise any sequel that opens with a newscaster describing the events of the first film as “implausible bullshit” and ends with a talking head in a jar. (I confess to a lifelong bias for pickled heads and/or brains in cinema. It’s something you just can’t get from statuary.)

Jason Statham reprises his career-defining role as the Britishly tenacious Chev Chelios, who seems to have survived being poisoned by “that Chinese shit” from the first film by falling out of a helicopter from 40,000 feet onto Wilshire Blvd., then having his heart removed by different Chinese people and replaced with an electric pump that comes with a handy battery-pack belt adorned with five lights that glow green or red. (Why they kept Chev alive at all if all they were after were his “strawberry tart” and sausage, I was a little unclear on). Like their poison, Chinese anesthesiology is no match for Chev’s irritation (nor, it would seem, are they very skilled couriers), and within a couple crushed testicles and shotgun-barrel sodomies he’s on the streets, shaking down pimps and random strangers for information, all of whom have exactly the intel he needs but refuse to give it up until he does something creative and painful to them. (Just between this movie and Watchmen, I’m pretty sure I’ve already witnessed fifty-seven onscreen interrogation scenes in 2009, and I haven’t even seen the Jonas Brothers movie yet.)

Bai Ling turns up periodically as a mangy, raving racial caricature who’s comically smitten by Chev’s total disinterest in her. She’s not too central to most of the action, though, so her entries and exits tend to get closer and closer together. At one point the filmmakers get her out of a scene by having her broadsided by a car, which like Chev Chelios she doesn’t mind much. In the Crank mythos, the good (i.e., better-looking) characters and evil (i.e., tattooed) ones both undergo about the same punishment levels, but only the bad guys feel pain. It’s kind of like Home Alone, only with Joe Pesci and Daniel Stern as the heroes and Bai Ling as that old snow-shovel guy.

That’s the main thing that kind of ruins Crank: High Voltage – way too many cameos. Between, Ling, Corey Haim, David Carradine, a bunch of porn stars, Ginger Spice as Ma Chelios, Dwight Yoakum as Chev’s lovably horny physician, and a buffed-out Efren Ramirez (Neveldine/Taylor give us not one but two fraternal revelations of major characters that somehow Chev never heard of before) providing carefully rationed slices of comic relief, there’s barely any room left for Amy Smart as Chev’s lovably dim-witted (and horny) girlfriend Eve. (Not enough Amy Smart is my usual gripe.)

When we first see Eve, she’s working in some ratty club as a stripper named Lemon because, as she explains to Chev, “I thought you were dead for three months” (apparently Eve wasn’t a stripper in the first movie). Instead of Chinatown, this time out Statham bangs her like a ragdoll at Hollywood Park on the racetrack while the crowd cheers and horse-penises soar in slo mo overhead* and an old woman that Chev groped earlier gasps with erotic horror. They’re not having sex just for gratuitous fun-loving reasons, despite the number of positions they switch to, but only because Chev’s electric battery-pack is down to one red bulb, which means he needs “friction” as opposed to the electricity he's been getting from cigarette lighters and jumper-cables thus far (often to the wry headshakes of passersby who’ve just seen him smash through a windshield). Later, Jason Statham turns into Godzilla. Still later, he has sex on the beach with Bai Ling while they’re both on fire. It’s a date movie.

Crank: High Voltage is wacky, and we like wacky, and sometimes gross-out funny, and we're down with that too, but I kind of wished there had been more variety to the action, which tends to be pretty heavy on generic interchangeable shoot-outs (another swimming pool denouement? really?). And the electric heart is actually pretty reliable compared to poison or even real hearts put through the same "paces" (get it?), so there’s not much sense of the first movie’s breakneck race-against-time (he also doesn't actually take any "crank" this time, which is kinda like if "The Wire" didn't have a wire one season). Chev’s indestructibility is sort of taken for granted at this point, by both the audience and the characters, which is funnier but also makes him less substantive as a protagonist. The filmmakers go to the trouble to explain that Chev was laid up in a coma for three months as a result of the injuries he sustained in the first film – the sequel may as well be set the same day as far as he’s concerned, or as Eve is for that matter.

But to nitpick Crank: High Voltage is dumber than anything in the movie itself. Inspired by videogames, it’s more like a game expansion than a sequel, but if you’re too young to see it, ditching school, baked to the point of paralysis, and Dragonball: Evolution is sold out, you'll only remember the good parts anyway.

*A man, a woman, and a kid whom I assume was theirs walked out during the racetrack sex scene, after abiding through dozens of decapitations and dismemberments. Because I’m a “synchronicity” buff, I like to think that they were the same trio who walked out of my Watchmen screening a few weeks back, and will walk out of whatever movie I see next month, and again, etc., until decades from now the four of us will have a reunion, which I’ll book the same theatre for, and out of which they’ll solemnly trudge only a few words into my welcome speech.

22
Vote
   


"Watchmen" review

March 31st 2009 07:14
Spectre, I don't even know her
The most faithful Alan Moore adaptation since "Return of Swamp Thing"!



[ Click here to read more ]
24
Vote
   


"The Wrestler" review

March 12th 2009 06:51
Bang the head slowly
If you thought his popcorn trick from Diner was painful...


In some ways, “The Wrestler” is Darren Aronofsky’s weirdest movie yet. Bleak and gritty, shot in drab, chilly, sweaty New Jersey locker-rooms and trailer parks, it offers a harsh, fluorescent look into the (final?) days of a self-described “brokendown piece of meat” who was once royalty in a sport that largely consists of enduring scripted physical punishment on a rubber mat before a crowd of howling human jackals. In subject matter and tone, it makes Requiem for a Dream look like Topper. But it also makes you feel more human, and embarrassed to be human*.
[ Click here to read more ]
50
Vote
   


"81st Annual Academy Awards" review

February 23rd 2009 07:49
Dance, monkeyboy, dance.
Not that Baz Luhrmann was nominated or anything.


A sea of human excrement indeed.
[ Click here to read more ]
42
Vote
   


"Zach and Miri Make A Porno" review

January 21st 2009 11:46
See it with someone who puts out!
The hottest love scene between Rogen and Banks since the bathtub one implied in “40 Year Old Virgin”!


Kevin Smith movies that don’t take place in the Kevin Smith oeuvre are officially more watchable. Here Smith gets sappy and Apatow (i.e., Sapatow), inordinately supported by the best poo jokes he’s ever written*, likable performances, and a refreshing self-disinterest. Watching Zach and Miri’s like taking a morning constitutional in a friendly dumb pink goo. Which these days is high-end.
[ Click here to read more ]
40
Vote
   


"The Day The Earth Stood Still" review

December 29th 2008 14:17
More like sat still
Keanu barada nikto.


A drearily Matrix-green remake of the slightly overrated 1951 film of the same name, The Day The Earth Stood Still ‘08 is yet another entry in Hollywood’s science-less apocalypse movies drenched in Christian (i.e., spiritually “uplifting”) symbolism featuring kids and unhappy parents (a la I Am Legend, The Invasion, Signs, Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull, and 10,000 B.C.), only less edgy than anything made in 1951. Apparently 20th Century Fox beamed this movie out into space, the better for potential marauding aliens to appreciate our sophisticated computerized cloud graphics, characterization and narrative logic; I predict they do a lot of fast-forwarding. (Fox also produced Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, which has a similar story arc but annoyingly wasn’t beamed anywhere.)
[ Click here to read more ]
50
Vote
   


"Synecdoche*, New York" review

December 17th 2008 00:11
PSH in
Philip Seymour Hoffman realizes he and his wife are headed in opposite artistic directions.


Synecdoche, New York is everything you’d expect from Charlie Kaufman’s directorial debut, an ambitious, occasionally hilarious but mostly bleak, nihilistic dissection of life, failure, growing old, and death, perversely disguised as a shaggy-dog story about a guy trying to write a play. D.F. Wallace would have savored it.
[ Click here to read more ]
29
Vote
   


"Quantum of Soulless" review

November 17th 2008 05:58
License to swill
All dressed up with double-nowhere to go.



[ Click here to read more ]
61
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
159 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by Kelly Wand
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]