Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Sprocket Holed - August 2008


There's no I in Jedi
As lifeless as if Lucas had directed it himself!


The action sequences in Clone Wars make the Bea Arthur cantina musical number from 1978’s “Star Wars Christmas Special” look like the lightsaber duel from The Empire Strikes Back. It makes you embarrassed for ever defending anything Star Wars-related. And it’s a perfect emblem of our drearily corporate times, of how terms like “child-friendliness” get thrown around as hair-trap excuses for a general collapse of standards. Because nothing, after all, is friendlier to a child than giving her/him bland clichés and sub-par animation.


George Lucas, the auteur who has repeatedly proclaimed that he doesn’t care what critics, the public, or anyone outside of his own immediate family over the age of three thinks (and who actually has the midichlorians to charge $35, I find out, for a set of action figures molded in the likenesses of his family members in the costumes they wore as extras in Episode II: Attack of the Clones), is now charging $12 movie-ticket admission rates to see a 90-minute commercial for an upcoming TV series on the Cartoon Network that’s totally unrelated to the vastly superior 2003 series on the same network created by the too-talented-for-Cartoon-Netw ork Genndy Tartakovsky – a movie and a series all based ENTIRELY on the time period no Star Wars fan or non-fan has the slightest interest in. That's right, Separatist droids vs. Imperialist clones for what Lucas promises will be over forty hours longer than both movie trilogies combined: whee!!!! Sure, we already know who wins, just as we already know all these cute little Jedi kids will soon be dead when Anakin goes bad and the maid finds Palpatine’s Sith robe in the laundry hamper, and obviously the "war" can’t actually end during the series’ run, but that just makes it even more exciting.


In his defense, Lucas apparently had nothing to do with the abysmal, insultingly dumb dialogue for once, although we do have him to thank for insisting on having the character of Ziro the Hutt (who in only three minutes total screen time effortlessly dethrones JarJar Binks as the most reviled Star Wars character of all time) talk in gay Southern English like Truman Capote, ostensibly because Lucas’ kids love Truman Capote. There’s so much else to hate going on, even its careless ruination of the beloved Yoda as a speech-impeded Dr. Theopolis third-stringer barely registers.

Save for the occasional pointless lightsaber duel, the movie seems only tenuously related to the Star Wars universe we knew (and once liked). There’s no John Williams score, no opening yellow text crawl, no space battles (i.e., no actual “star wars”), no reference to the Force, no indication of Anakin’s dark destiny, no sense of awe, and not even any of the trademark cornball Star Wars humor, unless you count the tiny bilious slug Stinky the Hutt’s whiny puking noises. Or the equally bilious observations voiced by the fatally spunky, personality-less new character whom we’ve never heard of, Ahsoka Tano, a pre-pubescent Twilek Jedi Padwan inexplicably assigned to first Obi-Wan then Anakin between firefights in the middle of a curiously inert street battle. Ahsoka Tano calls R2-D2 “Artooewie” and Anakin “Skyguy”; he reciprocates by calling her “Snips.” I guess because she’s hairless. Or blue. Or hasn’t filled out yet. Remember when the Jedi were genial, thoughtful, wise stoics? Dimly? Anakin doesn’t want Ahsoka around initially because….well, it’s not really explained why not, although she is certainly irritating. To help make kids like her, she’s always right about everything while her veteran battle commanders Anakin and Obi-Wan are always wrong; maybe that’s supposed to be humor too, even though billions of lives supposedly depend on their competence and discipline.

Like all three battles in the movie (i.e., one battle per TV “episode”), the first one is doused in purple and envisioned with the imagination of a small child devoid of peripheral vision. It takes place on a single straight avenue with no discernible architectural style or local populace or intersections. The droids (whose dialogue is presumably lifted verbatim from Lucas’ input during story meetings) seem to have the upper hand because of a heavily guarded shield generator, but Anakin trumps this technology by hiding himself and Ahsoka in a box and putting it in the middle of the street for the oncoming droids and tanks to march courteously around. Luckily they do just that, instead of trampling it or using sensors to see what’s in it or, uh, lifting it a couple inches to look underneath. If the droids are that dumb (and there is ample evidence as the movie progresses that they are, which doesn’t speak well of the Jedi being unable to finish them off in a single “war”), why not just hide the whole army in boxes? Or plant bombs in them? Or hell, anything remotely smacking of the sci-fi setting?

Later, Anakin and the clones attack another droid enclave by climbing up the side of a cliff ‘60’s Batman-style while the droids shoot down at them and say moronic jokes to their commanders and swoop around on flying bikes that the Jedi apparently forgot to bring their own versions of. I won’t give away who wins the battle but here’s a hint: Lucas. There’s also a Dark Jedi named Ventress, who must be really powerful because though uninjured, she runs away in the middle of a lightsaber duel with Obi-Wan and is never seen again. Anakin also duels Dooku inconclusively while Ahsoka kills some robots. Spoiler alert: nobody loses a hand. Most of the time, though, they’re fighting droids, which constitute so minor a threat, you kind of feel sorry for them. At one particularly nail-biting point, a bunch begin following Anakin and Ahsoka through some tunnels without attacking; understandably bored, Ahsoka seeks Anakin’s permission to slash them to pieces, does so, and they just keep going.

Towards the end, there’s a snoozy subplot involving the appearance of Natalie Portman’s Padme (minus the Natalie Portman part); since she’s a skilled diplomat, she sneaks into Jabba’s palace in disguise (original!), draws a gun on him, and gets captured and thrown in a cell. Meantime, Anakin and Ahsoka rescue baby Stinky and, noticing he looks sickly, call a drunk-sounding medical droid, who advises them to give it a lozenge and to call a real doctor. They don’t, although practically every scene involves one character calling another on futuristic cell-phones that get trampled and crushed and break instantly; the friend who dragged me to the movie observed it should have been called “Phone Wars.”

Clocking in at under ninety minutes, the movie somehow still manages to feel endless and stifling. The mostly bemused audience I saw it with didn’t boo it or cheer it either; they simply shuffled bovinely out, another disposable bauble ingested and instantly forgotten; on to the next. And why not. Clone Wars was purposely designed not to feel a single emotion about. Even for Star Wars fans. In fact, it made me realize that breaking up with Star Wars no longer actually means anything; it’s like announcing that Paris Hilton seems aloof. It’s impossible to imagine grown adults (or children for that matter) seriously discussing any events in this movie, let alone the impact of them on their previous conceptions of the Star Wars universe/canon/legacy. It’s a rubber eraser served as food, made by hacks exclusively for the pre-natal.

And after sitting, then slouching, then lying all the way through its interminable slush, the only thing that would entice me to watch the TV series is if it featured Bea Arthur with a lightsaber. Inside her.
44
Vote
Shared on
   


And I will always love you....
Rogen and Franco inhale just enough smoke.


You don’t have to be stoned to enjoy Pineapple Express but it most certainly helps.

As proof, here’s crotchety, bland, not-fit-to-lick-Siskel’s-anal -bead Richard Roeper on Pineapple Express: “Watching Pineapple Express is like sitting dead sober in a room with a bunch of stoned people who are laughing uproariously. They’re having a great time. You’re not.” (You sense Roeper wasn’t been invited to many parties as a tot, or a collegian, or an adult. Poor pasty milquetoast bastard.)

Pineapple Express opens in black and white, in 1937, and I’ve already spoiled too much. Director David Gordon Green's last credit was Snow Angels (a movie that doubtless caused Richard Roeper’s vagina to sing hymns), which was apparently neither an action movie nor a comedy, yet here he stages the funniest, longest, brutal-est, most ridiculous fights ever committed to celluloid, battles between stoners and stoners, stoners and cops, stoners and ninjas, and stoners and ninjas and drug dealer gunmen – enough weirdly paced, ingeniously chaotic, amusingly remorse-filled sequences that it’s hard to believe how much of the film consists of even more ingenious dialogue (much of it seemingly improvised), just as it’s hard to believe the film’s funniest character (and all of them are) isn’t Rogen or pompadoured Danny McBride but Spider-Man’s pretty-boy James Franco of all people, who does here for stoners what Heath Ledger did last month for clown princes. Rogen and McBride play the other two tips of what’s basically a gay love triangle (weed is a little gay, admittedly, from the canine affectionate vibes to the fact that you’re usually swapping lip-spit via joint-butts and bong-rims), all set against a staccato backdrop of gunfire and car chases and panicked dashes through kitchens and forests that never upstages the characters. It’s about being dumb when you’re high, and also about being smart.

There’s a funny subplot involving Rogen having dinner with his hot blond 18-year-old girlfriend and her understandably disapproving parents, for fear of her leaving him for a jock her own age who does killer Jeff Goldblum impressions. People get shot and tortured and burned and beaten but never seem to suffer; there’s never been a more laid-back movie with such a high body count. Stoners and gangsters alike confess their hurt feelings to their hardened male colleagues. Rosie Perez in a puffy little blue cop suit and a rangy, laid-back Gary Cole have bizarrely convincing foreplay. Stuff breaks. People die. The survivors have breakfast. It all sounds like a disjointed mess but what great comedy doesn’t? And as wacky as it all sounds (and is), part of the appeal is that set alongside most stoner comedies like Harold and Kumar and Cheech and Chong Drive A Van Someplace Else, the action in Express is comparatively confined to the real world. Comparatively.

It’s movies like this that complicate the already impossible task of explaining what makes great comedy work. Trying to analyze humor is like pinning a butterfly or, to paraphrase Franco’s character, killing a unicorn. Shaping and appreciating comedy is more like a reflex, a state of mind that doesn’t lend itself easily to story-pitch notes, and dissecting it is sort of like reading a medical article on how farts work versus hearing Richard Roeper rip one in the middle of delivering his grandmother’s eulogy.

And, curiously, the most obviously funny comic ideas rarely yield the best results. A friend of mine saw Tropic Thunder and observed that Ben Stiller’s ideas usually tend to be funnier than the execution. An action-movie guy, a lowbrow comedian, and Downey, Jr. in blackface all thinking they’re in a movie but fighting for real sounds good on paper but sort of one-note. Stiller hammers you with similar, predictable jokes over and over, loudly; he’s a little too proud of them. Pineapple Express’ pitch doesn’t sound as promising (the script was written all the way back in 2001 and was probably only greenlit thanks to Apatow) but its execution is inspired and as brilliant as Dark Knight in its casual self-assurance. It’s a funny movie where Tropic Thunder’s a funny trailer. It has barely audible throwaway lines like the one Red shouts near the end as he drives off leaving Rogen to die that are more memorable than anything in Get Smart or Thunder or any other comedy since, well, Superbad. You get the sense the performers were encouraged to try and bust up the crew with something unexpected during every shot, and one wonders enviously what they smoked at the wrap party.

Here’s hoping for a sequel, preferably scripted and shot on film-stock made entirely of hemp.


Special Bonus Anecdote:

En route to the theater, my stoned friend and I were accosted by a young dude and a girl with a nose-ring with intense expressions handing out Xeroxed leaflets on the sidewalk to passersby.

Girl with nose-ring: “Did you know the Government is making microchips to implant inside us all so they can keep track of our whereabouts 24 and 7?”

My friend and I in unison: “Yeah.”

Girl (confused): “Oh…”

My friend (reaching for the extended leaflet): “Does this tell me how I can get one?”

Girl (without really listening; smiles; urging us off): “Yeah, there’s a number on the back.”
53
Vote
Shared on
   


weiver "srorriM"

August 18th 2008 02:47
Her evil reflection's also hot.
.setanargemop muimerp s'nottaP aluaP


Give or take a “Prince of Darkness,” finally a movie that taps into our fears of our own reflections*! “Mirrors” is about equal parts dumb and scary but it easily trumps Carpenter’s 1987 ode to tachyons by featuring Amy Smart naked from behind, although you don’t get to enjoy it for long (unless you’re a jawbone fetishist; spoiler alert!). Paula Patton, “Mirrors”’s more buxom, less blond hottie, is also in it but not naked, although her blue-ribbon M & M’s are admirably wet and glisteny for much of the third act. And Kiefer Sutherland’s on hand, acting freaked out and psychotic like on “24.” There’s something for everyone.

“Mirrors” is apparently about a demon “trapped” General Zod-like in the indestructible, regenerative mirrors of a burned-out department store that once served as a mental asylum where they conducted therapy on schizophrenic kids via electroshock and, uh, mirrors. Mmm, the smell of crisp, burning exposition; is it autumn already? Kiefer, a recovering alcoholic ex-cop who shot somebody or something, takes a job as a night watchman at this burned-out husk (why do they even need one? there’s nothing unscorched left to steal) because it apparently pays better than a cop’s pension. Before his first night is over, the mirrors are psychically battering him with spooky-ass imagery, hand injuries, flames, and a demand that he find “Esseker.” Yay, word-mysteries! Since Kiefer’s an ex-alcoholic on dope, nobody believes anything he says, nor do they apparently associate his ravings with verbatim identical mirror-themed ravings about Esseker spewed by previous security guards and employees of the department store, all of whom went insane and supposedly killed themselves using shards of glass, although it was really their demonic reflections doing it. “A shard of glass?” Kiefer asks a coroner friend at one point. “He must have cut it off one of the mirrors before he used it,” she explains.

The mirror-demon doesn’t exactly make the task that it has assigned Kiefer much easier to fulfill by constantly harassing him, arbitrarily killing his sister, and terrorizing his family (without killing them too, for some reason); for his part, Kiefer doesn’t try too hard either, initially limiting his “Esseker” searches to the New York area and leaving his family alone in a house that he assures them is “the safest place” since they’ve painted over all the mirrors in chippable green paint. Hey, Dumb-Ass, how about a house WITHOUT any mirrors? At all? (Oh, and they also seem to have missed a few glass doorknobs, paint-wise.)

As the exposition progresses, Kiefer (who sure seems to be helping this demon out even though the bastard just murdered his sister) discovers that a nun named Sister Esseker is involved, so he brings her at gunpoint back to the department store to die horribly and incomprehensibly, even though she does mention just before exploding that she’s really doing it because he gave her a crumpled photo of his endangered family members. I.e., when he gave it to her a little earlier and she totally shot him down. Back at the house, which is where one would think Kiefer’d go right after getting a terrified call from his wife that the mirrors are attacking (why is the demon attacking them, if Kiefer’s doing just what the demon wants; plus wouldn’t ANY mirror probably work for what he has in “mind” since the demon seems able to emerge from any of them?), sexy wet Paula Patton learns while chasing her apparently possessed or insane son that the demons can come out of reflections in the water too (but not out of the reflections in people’s eyes or light-reflective clothing, I guess). She handles the situation by running around moistly and not getting attacked directly for some reason. A lot.

Luckily the kids live since kids never die in movies anymore (although maybe the son’s still possessed afterward; who knows), and Kiefer dispatches the demonically possessed nun by shooting, impaling, and incinerating her, which sorta suggests this demon was actually way more powerful when it was “imprisoned” in the mirrors and thus has been seeking all this time to be mortal and crippled and shootable. Then there’s a final twist that’s actually kind of cool and endearing and poetic and made me like the whole thing.

Retardation-levels and the repetitiveness of the “reflection-not-turning-when- you-do” gag notwithstanding, “Mirrors” is admittedly creepy most of the way through and does feature some impressive visuals, Amy Smart’s briefly nude backside far from least among them. Enjoy!

*Which hits most of us around puberty.
55
Vote
Shared on
   


"Hellboy: The Golden Army" review

August 7th 2008 01:02
Hell hath no fury like a boy scorned...
"Damned steampunk fairies..."



[ Click here to read more ]
54
Vote
Shared on
   


Maybe all those bandages are just from the chariot accident.


10. There are no mummies in the preview


[ Click here to read more ]
46
Vote
Shared on
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
150 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by Kelly Wand
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]